THE Archbishop of Canterbury has welcomed Parliament’s seizing control of the Brexit process. But, if it failed in its responsibilities, a second referendum was a “possible choice”, he said.
Archbishop Welby was speaking on Wednesday in the House of Lords, during a debate on the Government’s EU Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration.
On Tuesday evening, MPs passed a motion forcing the Government to publish full legal advice on Brexit, and a cross-party amendment, led by the Conservative MP Dominic Grieve, that would ensure Parliament had full control of the Brexit process, should the Prime Minister’s deal fail to be carried in the vote next week.
Click here to READ MORE
The Archbishop told peers that, after the previous evening’s events in the Commons, “the great decisions are now left firmly in the hands of Parliament, as is right.”
He went on: “Although a Remainer, I fully accept the decision of the referendum, which must now be implemented, and the shape of which is in the hands of Parliament, and particularly of the other place [the House of Commons].”
Whatever the final outcome of Brexit, he said, “there is a requirement for national reconciliation,” to restore, in Lord Sachs’s words, “core values of civilised discourse”.
The “negative impact” of the 2016 referendum was why he saw holding another referendum “as a possible but not immediately preferable choice, and then only if Parliament has failed in its responsibilities”.
He warned that Parliament should be on guard against “an accidental leaving without an agreement. We may drift into something that no single person chooses as their ideal.
“And if that happens, or even with some of the other options we have, there is a significant danger of adverse economic effect, with a fall in government revenue, a rise in unemployment, and greater poverty.
“Some may argue that is only going to be temporary. But we need to remember that, for those in poverty, temporary is an eternity.
“It must be the clear policy of this and all future governments, after so many years of austerity, borne so often by the poorest, that the burden of the transition to a post-EU economy — if there is a burden — must be carried by those with the broadest shoulders — the wealthiest — and not by further cuts, whether in local services, social care, benefits, the armed forces, climate-change budgets, education, or others that have lost so much in recent years.”
MPs are due to vote on the Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration on Tuesday, after five days of debate.
On that day, a prayer for Brexit, written by the Dean of Southwark, the Very Revd Andrew Nunn, will be read at Lichfield Cathedral. The text of the prayer was released by the Association of English Cathedrals this week in the hope that other cathedrals and churches would take it up.
It reads: “God of reconciling hope, as you guided your people in the past, guide us through the turmoil of the present time, and bring us to that place of flourishing where our unity can be restored, the common good served, and all shall be made well. In the name of Jesus we pray. Amen.”
The Dean of Lichfield, the Very Revd Adrian Dorber, who chairs the Association of English Cathedrals, said: “The outcome of that debate and vote will determine our nation’s future.
“It seems right, therefore, to invite people to come and pray in the cathedral, to remember the heavy responsibility on our parliamentarians, and to ask God for wisdom and integrity in our national life.”
Archbishop Welby’s full speech. “MY LORDS, of the choices of psalm that form part of our daily prayers in the Lords, we have Psalm 46, which we heard today – “The nations are in uproar, the kingdoms totter” – and Psalm 121, which we will doubtless hear tomorrow: “I lift up mine eyes to the hills, my help comes from the Lord who made heaven and earth.”
Eyes need to be lifted now more than ever. . . The withdrawal agreement and the political declaration are essentially political more than economic. The debate has moved on from the referendum campaign, which was the other way round.
Another change is that, as we know particularly since yesterday evening, the great decisions are now left firmly in the hands of Parliament, as is right. The decision as to this agreement and consequent legislation is thus about not just the immediate politics but national policy and identity, our future place in the world and how we develop it. It is long term, for the child born yesterday, and not just for parliamentarians today. And it must be made in the interests of those who will be here for the long term. In the midst of political struggle, that is a very hard thing to do, but it is the calling of parliament and one to which it has risen in equal crises in the past.
Read Full Article: ‘Don’t let poor pay for Brexit’, says Welby